Go Gators

I log in here only occasionally and I see thread after thread about you hating W, dude, let it go, it's over, your man is in there. Is it just a deep hatred of people you don't agree with politically, or the need for constant attention? Really, it's gotten old and becoming absurd for a man of your age and (self stated many times) position to be whining and ranting like a mentally unstable person...

Thomasville Gator wrote:I log in here only occasionally and I see thread after thread about you hating W, dude, let it go, it's over, your man is in there. Is it just a deep hatred of people you don't agree with politically, or the need for constant attention? Really, it's gotten old and becoming absurd for a man of your age and (self stated many times) position to be whining and ranting like a mentally unstable person...

I have always felt hate is a wasted emotion. But I mourn for what George Bush and his merry band of thieves, torturers and incompetents have done to the nation I love. As long as people who call themselves Americans come on this board to attempt to show Bush was something he was not, I will point that out. If you don't like it, don't read my posts.

self importance issue.... It's hard to read the forum w/ out reading your posts, they're everywhere, and they say the same thing over and over, hypocritical finger pointing, it's all W, the other party has done nothing wrong

Thomasville Gator wrote: your posts, they're everywhere, and they say the same thing over and over . . .

That's because the people who worshiped the late president keep telling the same lies they learned to tell from Rush for the 8 interminable years of that administration. Somebody has to speak up for the truth, and I seem to be the only one concerned with it on this board.

Whatever you think of Bush the damage that is coming from the current President will make Bush look like George Washington. You are a partisan hack..........nothing more so save me with your "country I love" BS. You, for 8 years, have been on the haters side of every issue and have misrepresented the opinions of others countless times in order to make some point. You have little if any proof of the lies you refer to but use that very "lie" to make a case.

hypocritical finger pointing, it's all W, the other party has done nothing wrong

Thats why he's a partisan hack.

spurdog wrote:Whatever you think of Bush the damage that is coming from the current President will make Bush look like George Washington. You are a partisan hack..........nothing more so save me with your "country I love" BS. You, for 8 years, have been on the haters side of every issue and have misrepresented the opinions of others countless times in order to make some point. You have little if any proof of the lies you refer to but use that very "lie" to make a case.

hypocritical finger pointing, it's all W, the other party has done nothing wrong

Thats why he's a partisan hack.

Doggie, you have been a partisan hack since you became indoctrinated in the pub party. I have given you sources, books to read by the people who were there when the decisions were made and you have declined to read them. I would say the partisan hack is the one who doesn't bother to go to source documents, but only keeps spouting the lies, fabrications and Bush myths that allow you to sleep at night after supporting these people.

If you want to see a partisan hack, look in your mirror.

I am supposed to read books by bitter rejects and those that were paid to tell a story a certain way in order to have the facts? That comical TL even from you. I think I'll pick up a few critical of Obama and even ones that suggest he isnt a U.S citizen, then call it fact. How's that?

There's one by Buzz Patterson. Read it.

BTW, your boy is about to stand by and watch the Taliban takeover Pakistan. You may try to lay it at the feet of Bush the most of the country wont see it that way and if the Pubs are smart they will use it as another example of how you cowards cant be trusted with national security.

spurdog wrote:I am supposed to read books by bitter rejects and those that were paid to tell a story a certain way in order to have the facts? That comical TL even from you. I think I'll pick up a few critical of Obama and even ones that suggest he isnt a U.S citizen, then call it fact. How's that?

There's one by Buzz Patterson. Read it.

BTW, your boy is about to stand by and watch the Taliban takeover Pakistan. You may try to lay it at the feet of Bush the most of the country wont see it that way and if the Pubs are smart they will use it as another example of how you cowards cant be trusted with national security.

How do you know they are "bitter rejects?" If you haven't read the books you're just accepting the pablum Fox News predictably ladles out to the intellectually lazy. Both O'neill and Clark are better people than Bush will ever be, but you wouldn't know that because you have your head in the Karl Rove sand and your a$$ in the air. And I don't have to read the books about Obama's birth certificate, the opinion of the Federal court throwing out that fantasy is all I need know.


As to Obama and Pakistan, are you recomending invading a sovreign state? Were you alive and out of diapers the last time a foreign power fought a war in that part of the world? The last I heard, Obama is increasing the troop strength in the area, do you have better info from Fox? If you have a son or daughter of draft age, would you reccomend they volunteer with the understanding they are going to be fighting a war in a country where 90% of the population will be anti-American? You might want to read TE Lawrence's book on guerilla wars and the ratio of troops to guerillas needed to put down an insurgency. Oops! I forgot, you are intellectually lazy and don't deign to read source materials, relying on Rush, Rove, the Manatee and O'really to tell you how things REALLY are.

Clark? Yeah he ran as a dem. pres. candidate. LMAO!!!!!!

Have you read any of Borks books? How about Clarence Thomas or Michael Schuerer?

spurdog wrote:Clark? Yeah he ran as a dem. pres. candidate. LMAO!!!!!!

Have you read any of Borks books? How about Clarence Thomas or Michael Schuerer?

That's the other side, so they're partisan hacks, buffoons, pompous morons and whatever else TL sees in the mirror every morning.

As to Obama and Pakistan, are you recomending invading a sovreign state? Were you alive and out of diapers the last time a foreign power fought a war in that part of the world? The last I heard, Obama is increasing the troop strength in the area, do you have better info from Fox? If you have a son or daughter of draft age, would you reccomend they volunteer with the understanding they are going to be fighting a war in a country where 90% of the population will be anti-American? You might want to read TE Lawrence's book on guerilla wars and the ratio of troops to guerillas needed to put down an insurgency. Oops! I forgot, you are intellectually lazy and don't deign to read source materials, relying on Rush, Rove, the Manatee and O'really to tell you how things REALLY are

No I'll just sit around and HOPE AQ doesnt get their hands on a nuke and use it in our country. Or maybe like you, I can hope that it wont happen in my lifetime and I can leave it for another generation to worry about because I dont have the balls to do something about it now. TE Lawrence might want to revise his book after Iraq and it really doesnt matter what the ratio is, if this comes to U.S soil it will be our reality to deal with whether we want to or not. I'm not suggesting we invade Pakistan but I dont think we can afford to allow the Taliban to take over Pakistan. Do you? And if not what do you suggest we do in order to keep that from happening? Maybe you can sit around and wait for Olberman, Maddow, Maher and Garofalo along with some of the other cowards and appeasers to tell you what to think and say. I already live in a country where 50% of population is anti-american posing as patriots.

He keeps mentioning Rush and O'reilly, which i never listen to or watch, i watch little to no TV. It's easier for TL to put all non Obama apologists in a box, evidently if you disagree w/ him you go in that box. Tolerance, except when you disagree with them...

Not to worry, boys......Thunderlips has a plan to regulate all terrorists.

When they're duly licensed and registered, we can all be safe and secure.

I generally try to avoid discussions of Bush at this point, but I look at who is doing most of the ranting and raving for the R's, and I swear most of them are complete idiots. The R party is really no longer the party of the thinking person or intellectual, it based upon emotional reactions, is highly tied to religion, rejects science and often relies on
"facts" or arguments that have been long disproven.

L-Boy wrote:I generally try to avoid discussions of Bush at this point, but I look at who is doing most of the ranting and raving for the R's, and I swear most of them are complete idiots. The R party is really no longer the party of the thinking person or intellectual, it based upon emotional reactions, is highly tied to religion, rejects science and often relies on
"facts" or arguments that have been long disproven.

And the Democratic Party is composed of black, homosexual, tree-hugging abortionists.....so what's your point?

L-Boy wrote:I generally try to avoid discussions of Bush at this point, but I look at who is doing most of the ranting and raving for the R's, and I swear most of them are complete idiots. The R party is really no longer the party of the thinking person or intellectual, it based upon emotional reactions, is highly tied to religion, rejects science and often relies on
"facts" or arguments that have been long disproven.

yeah, successful business people are all stupid, i'm sure they all wish they could be as smart as the magnate known as Lboy